Measured evidence,
not promises.

Six studies. Eight research institutions. 2.1 million sessions across 61,000+ users. The science behind moonbird is not a marketing claim, it is data, peer-reviewed and published.

users feel better immediately
n = 2,100,000 sessions
72%
HRV uplift at personal pace
vs. standard 6 BPM
+17.6%
preferred over competitor
p < 0.001
94%
additional sleep, elite athletes
WHOOP-measured
+35min
01

Before the data, the body.
How slow breathing changes things.

breathwork basics

Breathing is the one autonomic function you can take over at will. When you slow it down, a chain of physiological responses follows. Your vagus nerve fires more strongly, heart rate variability rises, and the balance between your stress and recovery systems tips toward rest. These three cards are what’s happening underneath a session.

autonomic balance

The brake and the gas.

HRV measures the tension between two branches of your nervous system: parasympathetic (rest & digest) and sympathetic (fight or flight). Slow breathing pulls the balance toward the brake.

Brake vs gas pedal
02

Six findings that hold up.

headline stats

Each number comes from a single, cited source. No averages across incomparable studies, no composite scores. Every stat links to the paper it came from.

01
72%

of stressed users feel noticeably better immediately after a session.

moonbird data · 2.1M sessions

02
27%

better sleep quality after one month. PSQI, clinically meaningful.

Vermeylen et al. 2022

03
+17.6%

HRV gain at your personal ideal pace vs. a fixed 6.0 BPM.

moonbird internal, n=552

04
+35min

additional sleep per night for elite athletes during the Euros.

Red Flames pilot, 2025

05
94%

preferred moonbird over a competing tactile breathing device.

Honinx et al. 2025

06
2.2×

the HRV improvement rate for adults 50+ vs. middle-aged users.

Truesdale et al., under review

Proof is good. Experience is better.

Try moonbird for 30 days, risk-free. Or start with the free app right now.

03

Your ideal pace is personal, and it moves.

core finding

One breath off,
and HRV falls.

A fixed 6 BPM is a compromise. Your resonance shifts by roughly 1 BPM within a single day. When you breathe 1–2 BPM off your ideal, HRV doesn’t plateau, it drops. Moonbird reads your heart rate continuously and finds the rate your body is in, right now.

One session at your personal pace beats a hundred at the wrong one. Rate selection, not repetition, is what drives the gain.

05101520HRV improvement (%)+0.5%Practice100 sessions, wrong pace+17.6%Personalization1 session, your pace
01020304050HRV loss from personal best (%)21%0.526%130%234%338%4+BPM off your optimal pace

The further off, the more you lose.

HRV loss increases monotonically with distance from your personal best pace. At 0.5 BPM off, you lose 21% of your gain. At 4+ BPM off, you lose 38%. This is why a generic "6 BPM for everyone" approach leaves most benefit on the table.

55%

more likely to finish a session feeling good on personalized vs. standard exercises.

~1 BPM

your ideal pace shifts within a single day.

· pullquote ·

A neurologist on what slow breathing does.

co-author, Honinx 2025
"Slow breathing impacts and reduces your stress levels."
Dr. Steven Laureys
Professor of Neurology · Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, University of Liege
04

Measurably better sleep, in a peer-reviewed trial.

Vermeylen 2022

PSQI components, before vs. after four weeks with moonbird

PSQI before/after
37%

better subjective sleep quality

p < .001

28%

faster sleep onset

p < .01

30%

more refreshing sleep

p < .001 (NRSS)

32%

less daytime dysfunction

p < .001

n = 394 weeksp < .001 · .01 · .05Frontiers in Digital Health
05

Elite athletes, tournament pressure.

Red Flames pilot

Belgian national team.
Measured by WHOOP.

Ten players from the Red Flames used moonbird through the Euros. On the nights they used it, their wearables showed more sleep, better sleep performance, and strong adherence with no coaching.

01
sleep duration per night
~7.6h without
~8.2h
+35 minp = 0.016
02
sleep performance score (WHOOP)
81.27%
85.36%
+5 ptsp = 0.046
03
recovery score (WHOOP)
65.32%
69.65%
+4.3 ptsns, p = 0.252
04
voluntary adherence
no coaching
77%
of daystournament context

Every claim, traced to a study.

Evaluation of a tactile breath pacer for sleep problems (Vermeylen et al. 2022)
Frontiers in Digital Health · 2022 · published

Evaluation of a tactile breath pacer for sleep problems

39 adults, one-month pilot. PSQI dropped three points, past the clinical threshold; subjective sleep quality improved 37% (p < .001) and daytime dysfunction fell 32% (p < .001). First peer-reviewed evidence that haptic breath pacing changes sleep in a normally-sleeping population.

read the article →
Breath pacer as adjuvant in cognitive behavioural therapy (Pleumeekers et al. 2024)
J. Evidence-Based Psychotherapies · 2024 · published

Breath pacer as adjuvant in cognitive behavioural therapy

Six case studies ranging from autism-spectrum anxiety to post-burnout recovery. All six participants continued using moonbird voluntarily after the clinical study ended, pointing to sustained engagement without coach pressure, unusual for a self-regulation tool.

read the article →
Two tactile breathing devices in stressed individuals (Honinx et al. 2025)
Int. J. Clinical & Health Psychology · 2025 · published

Two tactile breathing devices in stressed individuals

36 participants compared moonbird to a competing haptic breathing device. Moonbird increased HRV, shifted EEG power toward relaxation bands, and 94% preferred it. Co-authored with Prof. Steven Laureys (University of Liege, Coma Science Group).

read the article →
University of Amsterdam & moonbird · 2026 · under review

Real-world effects on HRV, consumer data analysis

552 real-world users across 84 sessions. Sustained RSA gain with repetition, and a pronounced age effect: adults over 50 improved at 2.2× the rate of middle-aged users (30–49). Largest consumer-device HRV dataset published for breathwork to date.

MDPI · 2026 · under review

Two-month breathing intervention on affect, stress, and exams

62-participant RCT with university students across two exam periods. Breathwork was most effective precisely when subjective stress was highest, with measurable gains in negative-affect reduction and perceived control during high-pressure weeks.

Red Flames pilot · 2025 · unpublished

Effects on sleep and recovery in elite female football players

Ten Belgian national-team players used moonbird through the 2025 European Championships. WHOOP-measured: +35 minutes sleep per night (p = 0.016), +5 percentage points sleep performance (p = 0.046), and 77% voluntary adherence without any coaching.

· partners ·

Research partners across three countries.

8 institutions
0
research institutions
0
countries
0
studies, published or under review
0k+
users across 2.1M sessions

Let’s do science
together.

We share our data, our methods, and our device with research groups across clinical, behavioural, and sport-science domains. If you are running a study in breathwork, HRV, sleep, stress, anxiety, ADHD, or adjacent areas, we would love to hear from you.

Moonbird has already partnered with eight institutions across three countries. Six studies are published or under review. The next one could be yours.

Research partnerships

Devices and app access for study participants
Anonymised HRV, session, and app-interaction data
Methodology support and co-authorship where appropriate
Start a collaboration